Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Badesaba | بادصباBadesaba | بادصبا
VS
DXC TechnologyDXC Technology
Badesaba | بادصبا

Badesaba | بادصبا

Set Center, Janbaz Blvd, Mashhad, IR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.badesaba.ir
712/1000Moderate

"A world of users, a world of experience" put us on the path where we realized that the secret of winning in being together. This company is where not only you, but also your family is precious to us. We do not guarantee your job, we guarantee your growth. If you are ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:61
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

20408 Bashan Dr, Ashburn, 20147, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dxc.com
759/1000Fair

DXC Technology helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. The world's largest companies and public sector o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:89,953
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Badesaba | بادصبا

Badesaba | بادصبا

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Badesaba | بادصبا has 32.89% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXC Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Badesaba | بادصبا (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Badesaba | بادصبا cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DXC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Badesaba | بادصبا

Badesaba | بادصبا

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BAD1772389516
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BADNATISR1772454636
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BAD1772735632
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا company and DXC Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا and DXC Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا and DXC Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Badesaba | بادصبا or DXC Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Badesaba | بادصبا or DXC Technology ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا and DXC Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Badesaba | بادصبا and DXC Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9