Comparison Overview

Babcock Rail

VS

Stadler

Babcock Rail

-, -, G72 0FT, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 800 and 849

Following the acquisition of VT Group, Babcock has undergone a rebrand. The use of divisional names has been removed so that all business units can stand under the one banner and be united as Babcock. With this in mind we would like to redirect you to the company profile Babcock International Group PLC. Babcock Rail is a UK focused railway infrastructure support business selected as one of only four track renewal contractors to Network Rail.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 174
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Stadler

Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

International rail vehicle construction company, Stadler, is headquartered in Bussnang in Eastern Switzerland. Founded in 1942, it has a workforce of around 11,000 based in various production and over 40 service locations. Stadler provides a comprehensive range of products in the heavy and urban transport segments: High-speed trains, intercity trains, regional and commuter heavy rail trains, underground trains, tram trains and trams. Stadler also manufactures main-line locomotives, shunting locomotives and passenger carriages, including the most powerful diesel-electric locomotive in Europe. It is the world’s leading manufacturer in the rack-and-pinion rail vehicle industry.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 5,244
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Babcock Rail
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stadler-rail.jpeg
Stadler
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Babcock Rail
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Stadler
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Babcock Rail in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Stadler in 2025.

Incident History — Babcock Rail (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Babcock Rail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Stadler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stadler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Babcock Rail
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/stadler-rail.jpeg
Stadler
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2020
Type:Malware
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Babcock Rail company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Stadler company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Stadler company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Babcock Rail company has not reported any.

In the current year, Stadler company and Babcock Rail company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Stadler company nor Babcock Rail company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Stadler company nor Babcock Rail company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Stadler company nor Babcock Rail company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Babcock Rail company nor Stadler company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Stadler company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Babcock Rail company.

Stadler company employs more people globally than Babcock Rail company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Babcock Rail nor Stadler holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H