Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Babcock - Nuclear sectorBabcock - Nuclear sector
VS
AtkinsAtkins
Babcock - Nuclear sector

Babcock - Nuclear sector

N/A

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.babcockinternational.com/what-we-do/nuclear/
753/1000Fair

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Atkins

Atkins

Ashley Road, Epsom, KT18 5BW, GB

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.atkinsglobal.com
790/1000Fair

Atkins is now AtkinsRéalis. Please follow AtkinsRéalis on LinkedIn. We are a world-class engineering services and nuclear organization. We connect people, data and technology to transform the world’s infrastructure and energy systems. Together, with our industry part...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:10,211
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Babcock - Nuclear sector

Babcock - Nuclear sector

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Atkins

Atkins

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Babcock - Nuclear sector in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atkins in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Babcock - Nuclear sector (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Babcock - Nuclear sector cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Atkins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atkins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Babcock - Nuclear sector

Babcock - Nuclear sector

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Atkins

Atkins

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector company and Atkins company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector and Atkins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector and Atkins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Babcock - Nuclear sector or Atkins ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Babcock - Nuclear sector or Atkins ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector and Atkins, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Babcock - Nuclear sector and Atkins, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES