Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

B-School by BNP ParibasB-School by BNP Paribas
VS
Rutgers UniversityRutgers University
B-School by BNP Paribas

B-School by BNP Paribas

Paris, FR

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile

B-School by BNP Paribas, c’est une équation simple : une école🎓 et une entreprise💼 réunies pour vous accompagner vers un diplôme✅ et un CDI✅. Notre école vous prépare à l’obtention d’un diplôme reconnu par l’Etat et vous donne accès à des métiers à forts enjeux au sei...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:90
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

57 US Highway 1, New Brunswick, NJ, US, 08901

Last Update: 08/05/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.rutgers.edu
697/1000Weak

Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, stands among America’s highest-ranked, most diverse public research universities. The oldest, largest, and top-ranked public university in the New York/New Jersey metropolitan area, you’ll find us at our main locations in thr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:18,207
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
B-School by BNP Paribas

B-School by BNP Paribas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for B-School by BNP Paribas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Rutgers University has 86.92% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - B-School by BNP Paribas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

B-School by BNP Paribas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rutgers University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rutgers University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
B-School by BNP Paribas

B-School by BNP Paribas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rutgers University

Rutgers University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
THEYALRUTHARSTAINSPRI1778258906
🔒 Incident : Breach
MCGVERHARUDE1777034314
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
RUT1206323

FAQ

Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas company and Rutgers University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas and Rutgers University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - B-School by BNP Paribas or Rutgers University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - B-School by BNP Paribas or Rutgers University ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas and Rutgers University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between B-School by BNP Paribas and Rutgers University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3