Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Panda Retail Company – Savola GroupPanda Retail Company – Savola Group
VS
ArbonneArbonne
Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

Headquarters Business Park - Savola Group Tower HQ, Jeddah, Jeddah, undefined, SA

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.panda.com.sa
789/1000Fair

Panda was founded in 1978 as one of the most important organizations in the retail sector in Saudi Arabia. In 1994, Panda merged with Azizia Company then in late 1998 Azizia Panda United was acquired by Savola Group, one of the largest diversified conglomerates in MENA ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:4,921
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Arbonne

Arbonne

19800 MacArthur Blvd, Irvine, California, US, 92612

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.arbonne.com
774/1000Fair

Arbonne, creates personal skincare and wellness products that are crafted with premium botanical ingredients and innovative scientific discovery. Delivering on the Company’s commitment to pure, safe and beneficial products, Arbonne’s personal care and nutrition formulas...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,420
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Arbonne

Arbonne

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panda Retail Company – Savola Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbonne in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Panda Retail Company – Savola Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panda Retail Company – Savola Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Arbonne (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbonne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

Panda Retail Company – Savola Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Arbonne

Arbonne

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ARB1315301222

FAQ

Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group company and Arbonne company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group and Arbonne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group and Arbonne, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Panda Retail Company – Savola Group or Arbonne ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Panda Retail Company – Savola Group or Arbonne ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group and Arbonne, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Panda Retail Company – Savola Group and Arbonne, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2