Comparison Overview

Axiata

VS

Cox Communications

Axiata

Level 23, Axiata Tower, 9 Jalan Stesen Sentral 5 KL Sentral, Kuala Lumpur 50470, MY
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.axiata.com

AXIATA GROUP BERHAD 242188-H (199201010685) In pursuit of its vision to be The Next Generation Digital Champion, Axiata is a diversified telecommunications and digital conglomerate operating Digital Telcos, Digital Businesses and Infrastructure businesses across a footprint spanning ASEAN and South Asia. The Group has controlling stakes in market-leading mobile and fixed operators in the region including 'XL’ and ‘Link Net' in Indonesia, 'Dialog' in Sri Lanka, 'Robi' in Bangladesh, and 'Smart' in Cambodia while 'CelcomDigi' in Malaysia is a Key Associate Company. Axiata’s regional digital business verticals comprise ‘Boost’ a fintech company, and ‘ADA’, a digital analytics and AI company. 'EDOTCO' is among the top 10 independent TowerCos globally, operating in nine countries to deliver telecommunications infrastructure services. As a committed and long-term investor, the Group actively supports and drives young talent development; community outreach; as well as climate change initiatives. Axiata's broader goal of Advancing Asia aims to piece together the best in the region in terms of innovation, connectivity and talent to drive digital inclusion and sustainable progress across our markets. Find out more at www.axiata.com

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cox Communications

6205 Peachtree Dunwoody Road, None, Atlanta, GA, US, 30328
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cox.com

Cox Communications is committed to creating more moments of real human connection. We bring people closer to family and friends through technology that’s inspired by a culture that puts people first, and we’re always working to improve life in the communities we serve. Our world-class broadband applications and services are helping create smart homes and smart cities that will bring more comfort, convenience, security, entertainment and connectivity to the lives of the people we serve. Our company is full of dreamers and doers; people who make plans and who make things happen. And, of course, people who have fun doing it. In short, people like you. Join the Cox team and make your mark!

NAICS: 517
NAICS Definition: Telecommunications
Employees: 16,385
Subsidiaries: 23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiata.jpeg
Axiata
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cox-communications.jpeg
Cox Communications
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Axiata
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cox Communications
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Axiata in 2025.

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cox Communications in 2025.

Incident History — Axiata (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Axiata cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cox Communications (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cox Communications cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/axiata.jpeg
Axiata
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cox-communications.jpeg
Cox Communications
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Exploit (CVE-2025-61882), Unauthenticated Access, Multi-Stage Java Implants, Data Exfiltration
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Internal (Insider)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 1/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Automated Collection Methods
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Axiata company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Cox Communications company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Cox Communications company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Axiata company has not reported any.

In the current year, Cox Communications company has reported more cyber incidents than Axiata company.

Cox Communications company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Axiata company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cox Communications company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Axiata company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Cox Communications company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Axiata company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Axiata company nor Cox Communications company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Cox Communications company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Axiata company.

Cox Communications company employs more people globally than Axiata company, reflecting its scale as a Telecommunications.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Axiata nor Cox Communications holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References