Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AXAAXA
VS
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)
AXA

AXA

25, avenue Matignon, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 15/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.axa.com
804/1000Good

As one of the largest global insurers, our purpose is to act for human progress by protecting what matters. Protection has always been at the core of our business, helping individuals, businesses and societies to thrive. And AXA has always been a leader, an innovator, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:141,854
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Tower, Jakarta, 12910, ID

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.prudential.co.id
777/1000Fair

Listening. Understanding. Delivering. At Prudential Indonesia we deliver excellence by consistently innovating, creating new opportunities and growing our business to cater all of our customers'​ needs. With a vision of becoming truly world class, Prudential Indonesia...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:11,936
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AXA

AXA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AXA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AXA

AXA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AXA12312222
Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AXA company and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AXA and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AXA and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AXA or Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AXA or Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance) ?
Between AXA and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AXA and Prudential Indonesia (PT Prudential Life Assurance), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2