Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AXA KoreaAXA Korea
VS
Zurich InsuranceZurich Insurance
AXA Korea

AXA Korea

Hangangdaero71-gil 4, Yongsan-gu, 04322, KR

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile

AXA is one of the largest global insurance companies worldwide. We service over 95 million customers worldwide, in 50 countries. As a result, we enjoy international exposure and have the chance to work with multicultural teams. To achieve AXA Korea's vision of becoming ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:131
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Zurich Insurance

Zurich Insurance

Mythenquai 2, Zurich, Zurich, CH, 8002

Last Update: 30/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.zurich.com
813/1000Good

Zurich Insurance Group (Zurich) is a leading global multi-line insurer founded more than 150 years ago, which has grown into a business serving more than 75 million customers in more than 200 countries and territories, while delivering industry-leading total shareholder...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:46,958
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AXA Korea

AXA Korea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Zurich Insurance

Zurich Insurance

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA Korea in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zurich Insurance in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AXA Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Zurich Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zurich Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AXA Korea

AXA Korea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Zurich Insurance

Zurich Insurance

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
ZUR024131222

FAQ

Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AXA Korea company and Zurich Insurance company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AXA Korea and Zurich Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AXA Korea and Zurich Insurance, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AXA Korea or Zurich Insurance ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AXA Korea or Zurich Insurance ?
Between AXA Korea and Zurich Insurance, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AXA Korea and Zurich Insurance, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2