Comparison Overview
AXA Japan

AXA Japan
Tokyo, JP
Last Update: 07/03/2026
A French-Global insurance and Asset Management Group, serving 93 million customers in 51 countries with 145,000 employees. The origin of AXA was a small mutual property & casualty insurance company founded in 1817 in Normandy, Ancienne Mutuelle de Rouen, which was rebra...

Brown & Brown
300 N Beach St, Daytona Beach, 32114, US
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Brown & Brown delivers risk management solutions to help protect and preserve what our customers value most. Our two business segments, Retail and Specialty Distribution, offer businesses and individuals a wide range of insurance solutions. We are one of the insurance ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AXA Japan







Brown & Brown






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AXA Japan in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown in 2026.
Incident History - AXA Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AXA Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Brown & Brown (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Brown & Brown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AXA Japan

Brown & Brown
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.
pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.
The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/6e9cb75a9b7259353f983fc90ca28b1da3742e18
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/c4feab0f7f86d61505a48e40d383c8a375a22e18
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-2.16.1
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-3.0.12
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/security/advisories/GHSA-3wp9-xfwm-rjjf
The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/75a278550aa9a980009d022fb4e635f9c8738c03
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/ccdcaa627db6d96dcc42105212cb3ba5048bd7f9
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-2.16.1
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-3.0.12
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/security/advisories/GHSA-rwhr-j9rv-85f8
The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/dca2d90db87f0144ea893a6858dca13c426d06b6
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/commit/e1f5fc88fe211d3f64032c33b91093ba3d5e793d
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-2.16.1
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/releases/tag/async-http-client-project-3.0.12
- https://github.com/AsyncHttpClient/async-http-client/security/advisories/GHSA-mfj3-87qq-382v