Comparison Overview
AWS Partners

AWS Partners
410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98109, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
AWS Partners and AWS Marketplace sellers are uniquely positioned to help businesses take full advantage of Amazon Web Services (AWS) and accelerate your journey to the cloud. AWS has millions of active customers and over 100,000 Partners globally. More than 90% of Fort...

TIVIT
Avenida das Nações Unidas 8501, São Paulo, 05425-070, BR
Last Update: 12/09/2026
TIVIT is a Brazil-based multinational company that offers enterprise-level digital solutions, and operates in ten countries in Latin America. We help our clients develop their businesses by offering industry-leading digital solutions divided into four main categories: D...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AWS Partners







TIVIT






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
AWS Partners has 104.08% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for TIVIT in 2026.
Incident History - AWS Partners (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AWS Partners cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - TIVIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)
TIVIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AWS Partners

TIVIT
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.