Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AWS JapanAWS Japan
VS
DXC TechnologyDXC Technology
AWS Japan

AWS Japan

N/A

Last Update: 27/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://aws.amazon.com/jp/
751/1000Fair

Amazon 社内のビジネス課題を解決するために生まれた IT インフラストラクチャのノウハウをもとに、2006 年、アマゾン ウェブ サービス(AWS)はウェブサービスという形態で、企業を対象に IT インフラストラクチャサービスの提供を開始しました。 クラウドコンピューティングの主なメリットの1つは、必要な時に、必要なだけ、低価格で IT リソースを提供することができることです。クラウドを使用することで、企業はもはや数週間・数ヵ月も前から、サーバーや他の IT インフラストラクチャを計画・調達する必要がなくなります。クラウドなら...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:92
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

20408 Bashan Dr, Ashburn, 20147, US

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dxc.com
758/1000Fair

DXC Technology helps global companies run their mission-critical systems and operations while modernizing IT, optimizing data architectures, and ensuring security and scalability across public, private and hybrid clouds. The world's largest companies and public sector o...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:89,953
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AWS Japan

AWS Japan

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AWS Japan in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DXC Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AWS Japan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AWS Japan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - DXC Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DXC Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AWS Japan

AWS Japan

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
DXC Technology

DXC Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AWS Japan company and DXC Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AWS Japan and DXC Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AWS Japan and DXC Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AWS Japan or DXC Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AWS Japan or DXC Technology ?
Between AWS Japan and DXC Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AWS Japan and DXC Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8