Comparison Overview
AWR Design Environment
AWR Design Environment
1960 E. Grand Avenue, El Segundo, California, 90245, US
Last Update: 12/03/2026
The wireless revolution that brought smartphones and wifi-enabled everything to you is largely thanks to AWR software. Our design tools are what microwave and RF engineers use to design wireless products....from base stations to cellphones to satellite communications. ...
Atlassian
Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, 2000, AU
Last Update: 06/10/2026
Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practice...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
AWR Design Environment
Atlassian
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AWR Design Environment in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Atlassian has 488.24% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - AWR Design Environment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AWR Design Environment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
AWR Design Environment
Atlassian
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.