Comparison Overview
AWP Safety

AWP Safety
4244 Mt. Pleasant St. NW, North Canton, 44720, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
AWP Safety® is North America’s leading worksite safety partner, protecting those who build our infrastructure. The company specializes in supplying the manpower to guide traffic safety around work zones. AWP Safety’s capabilities range from work zone flagging to design ...

Framatome
1 place Jean Millier, Courbevoie, FR, 92400
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Framatome is an international leader in nuclear energy recognized for its innovative, digital and value added solutions for the global nuclear fleet. With worldwide expertise and a proven track record for reliability and performance, the company designs, services and in...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AWP Safety







Framatome






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AWP Safety in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Framatome in 2026.
Incident History - AWP Safety (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AWP Safety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Framatome (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Framatome cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AWP Safety

Framatome
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.