Comparison Overview

Aviva

VS

Seguros SURA

Aviva

80 Fenchurch Street, London, undefined, EC3M 4AE, , GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our customers. We want Aviva to be a place where people can be themselves, and we want our workforce to reflect the customers and communities we serve. This means offering market-leading benefits and challenging ourselves to do more to build a workplace – and society – that works for all. It takes you. It takes Aviva.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 24,415
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Seguros SURA

Edificio Suramericana Carrera 64 B 49 A 30, Medellín, Antioquia, CO
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

SURA es una compañía que integra en diferentes empresas soluciones en seguros y seguridad social. Su marca se presenta a los clientes como Seguros SURA, ARL SURA y EPS SURA. Existen otras marcas y empresas, especialmente de prestación de servicios, que hacen parte de la Compañía. Nuestra experiencia y solidez está soportada en 80 años de trayectoria en el mercado de los seguros. Tiempo en el que hemos acompañado a los latinoamericanos en todas las etapas de la vida con productos que se ajustan a sus necesidades de protección. Para responder a nuestras promesas de aseguramiento contamos con una estructura sólida de negocios, permitiéndonos construir relaciones de largo plazo con nuestros clientes basadas en la tranquilidad de estar bien protegidos. La vida y el patrimonio económico son una prioridad para SURA, por ello ofrecemos un amplio portafolio de soluciones.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 14,276
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aviva-plc.jpeg
Aviva
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seguros-sura.jpeg
Seguros SURA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aviva
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seguros SURA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aviva in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seguros SURA in 2025.

Incident History — Aviva (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aviva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seguros SURA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seguros SURA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aviva-plc.jpeg
Aviva
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Phishing, Social Engineering
Motivation: Revenge
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seguros-sura.jpeg
Seguros SURA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Aviva company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seguros SURA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aviva company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Seguros SURA company has not reported any.

In the current year, Seguros SURA company and Aviva company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seguros SURA company nor Aviva company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seguros SURA company nor Aviva company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Aviva company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Seguros SURA company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aviva company nor Seguros SURA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aviva company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Seguros SURA company.

Aviva company employs more people globally than Seguros SURA company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aviva nor Seguros SURA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H