Comparison Overview
Aviatrix

Aviatrix
2901 Tasman Dr, Suite 109, Santa Clara, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Aviatrix® is the cloud network security expert. We’re on a mission to make cloud networking simple so companies stay agile. Trusted by more than 500 of the world’s leading enterprises, our cloud networking platform creates the visibility, security, and control needed to...

DoorDash
San Francisco, US
Last Update: 07/10/2026
At DoorDash, our mission to empower local economies shapes how our team members move quickly and always learn and reiterate to support merchants, Dashers and the communities we serve. We are a technology and logistics company that started with door-to-door delivery, and...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Aviatrix







DoorDash






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aviatrix in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
DoorDash has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Aviatrix (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aviatrix cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DoorDash (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DoorDash cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Aviatrix

DoorDash
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Trident versions v25.02.1 through v26.06.1 are susceptible to a vulnerability that could allow an authenticated attacker with access to debug logs to view LUKS passphrases or SMB Active Directory credentials.
Remote Attestation TLS Clients provides multi-language utilities for verifying attested TLS connections. Prior to 0.5.0, the Rust and Go RA-TLS challenge verifiers accepted quote ReportData that was bound to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session before permitting application traffic. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing the clients to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in 0.5.0.
Enclave OS Virtual runs container workloads inside confidential virtual machines with end-to-end attestation. Prior to tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27, the TDX/GPU RA-TLS certificate issuer placed the certificate public-key hash and client nonce in quote ReportData but omitted a value bound to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept an attacker-terminated connection as the attested enclave. This issue is fixed in tdx-v0.2.43 and tdx-gpu-v0.6.27.
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/commit/9a6be91e29f2b6738d0b77c33cd1ad5cd3d8a347
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/releases/tag/tdx-gpu-v0.6.27
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/releases/tag/tdx-v0.2.43
- https://github.com/Privasys/enclave-os-virtual/security/advisories/GHSA-p5fp-g94g-g9m9
- https://privasys.org/blog/binding-attestation-to-the-tls-session
Privasys Go is a maintained fork of the Go programming language that adds RA-TLS support to crypto/tls. Prior to privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5, challenge-mode RA-TLS certificates bound quote ReportData to the certificate public key and client nonce but not to the active TLS session. An attacker who obtained an enclave TLS private key could relay a genuine quote onto another connection, causing a relying party to accept a handshake terminated by the attacker as an attested enclave connection. This issue is fixed in privasys-v0.5.1-go1.26.5.
Aegisub is a cross-platform advanced subtitle editor. From 3.2.0 to 3.4.2, Aegisub automatically loads Automation scripts referenced by `Automation Scripts` metadata in `ASS` subtitle projects without asking whether the user trusts the scripts or their authors. An attacker can distribute a crafted `ASS` file together with a referenced malicious Automation script, and opening the `AS` file executes arbitrary code with the privileges of the Aegisub process. From 3.4.0 to 3.4.2, inconsistent handling of embedded `NUL` characters between extension validation and filesystem operations additionally allows a crafted `ASS/Lua` polyglot to reference and execute itself as a single-file variant. The vulnerability is fixed in Aegisub 3.5.0.
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/0a3073d59f10432eeebea65018b02ef4d0a87fff
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/b5bf23979e7453f7b1cc8ffeb82b3cc2d2ca75e6
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/commit/e4099055711cce327840870c050ce46e58f4aee0
- https://github.com/TypesettingTools/Aegisub/security/advisories/GHSA-67hq-5vgg-6f23