Comparison Overview
Avia Solutions Group

Avia Solutions Group
Office 7, Vantage, Central Park, Leopardstown, Dublin 18, D18 FT0C, Dublin, D18 FT0C, IE
Last Update: 04/12/2025
Avia Solutions Group, the world’s largest ACMI (Aircraft, Crew, Maintenance, and Insurance) provider, operates a fleet of 145 aircraft on 6 continents. Supported by 14,000 professionals, the group is the parent company to over 250+ subsidiaries including Avion Express, ...

SAUDI AIRLINES
Al Rawdah, Al Khalidiyyah 23421, JEDDAH, Makkah, SA, 23421- 2229
Last Update: 04/09/2026
At Saudia Group, we're on a mission to inspire people to go beyond borders. Our purpose is rooted in unlocking human potential and connecting the world in ways never thought possible. We are committed to reshaping the aviation ecosystem in our region and beyond, by embr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Avia Solutions Group







SAUDI AIRLINES






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avia Solutions Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SAUDI AIRLINES in 2026.
Incident History - Avia Solutions Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avia Solutions Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SAUDI AIRLINES (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SAUDI AIRLINES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Avia Solutions Group

SAUDI AIRLINES
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.
The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.
The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.
With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.
The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.