Comparison Overview
AVG Technologies

AVG Technologies
Prague, CZ
Last Update: 03/09/2026
AVG Technologies was acquired in 2016 by Avast. Please follow us over at Avast: https://www.linkedin.com/company/avast/ AVG delivers products and services to help make your digital world simpler to navigate, easier to secure, and more enjoyable to live in. Using the la...

Shopee
5 Science Park Dr, Shopee Building, Singapore, 118265, SG
Last Update: 21/09/2026
Shopee is a leading e-commerce platform in Southeast Asia, Taiwan, and Brazil. Launched in 2015, our platform connects shoppers, brands and sellers within one ecosystem. Shopee offers an easy, secure and engaging online shopping experience enjoyed by millions of people...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AVG Technologies







Shopee






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
AVG Technologies has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Shopee in 2026.
Incident History - AVG Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AVG Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Shopee (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Shopee cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AVG Technologies

Shopee
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.