Comparison Overview
Avery Dennison Smartrac

Avery Dennison Smartrac
Willem Einthovenstraat 11, Oegstgeest, South Holland, NL, 2342
Last Update: 27/02/2026
Digital journey. Digital transformation. Digital evolution. Call it what you will, but the fact is we’ve all been living on ‘planet digital’ for a good while now. That’s why it’s time to change the narrative of digital simply being a thing we do, when in reality it thre...

Molex
2222 Wellington Court, Lisle, IL, US, 60532
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Molex makes a connected world possible by enabling technologies that transform the future and improve lives. With a presence in more than 40 countries, Molex offers a complete range of connectivity products, services and solutions for the data communications, medical, i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Avery Dennison Smartrac







Molex






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison Smartrac in 2026.
Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Molex in 2026.
Incident History - Avery Dennison Smartrac (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Avery Dennison Smartrac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Molex (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Molex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Avery Dennison Smartrac

Molex
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.