Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging MaterialsAvery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials
VS
EssityEssity
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

8080 Norton Parkway, Mentor, OH, US, 44060

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Avery Dennison Corporation (NYSE: AVY) is a global materials science and digital identification solutions company. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that help advance the industries we serve, providing branding and information solutions that optimize labor ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:2,497
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Essity

Essity

Klarabergsviadukten 63, Stockholm, SE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
795/1000Fair

Essity - a globally leading hygiene and health company. Our expertise in hygiene and health began with the acquisition of the Swedish company Mölnlycke in 1975, through which our roots stretch back to 1849. Today, our sustainable innovations from globally trusted brands...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:19,495
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Essity

Essity

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Essity in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Essity (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Essity cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Essity

Essity

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and Essity company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and Essity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and Essity, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials or Essity ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials or Essity ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and Essity, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and Essity, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA