Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging MaterialsAvery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials
VS
EssilorLuxotticaEssilorLuxottica
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

8080 Norton Parkway, Mentor, OH, US, 44060

Last Update: 16/03/2026

View Profile
771/1000Fair

Avery Dennison Corporation (NYSE: AVY) is a global materials science and digital identification solutions company. We are Making Possible™ products and solutions that help advance the industries we serve, providing branding and information solutions that optimize labor ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:2,497
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
EssilorLuxottica

EssilorLuxottica

1-6, Rue Paul Cézanne, Paris, FR

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
826/1000Good

We are EssilorLuxottica, a global leader in the design, manufacture and distribution of advanced vision care products, eyewear and med-tech solutions. Our Mission is to help people around the world to see more and be more by addressing their evolving vision needs, perso...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:73,717
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
EssilorLuxottica

EssilorLuxottica

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EssilorLuxottica in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - EssilorLuxottica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EssilorLuxottica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
EssilorLuxottica

EssilorLuxottica

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
ESS023091825

FAQ

Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials company and EssilorLuxottica company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and EssilorLuxottica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and EssilorLuxottica, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials or EssilorLuxottica ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials or EssilorLuxottica ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and EssilorLuxottica, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Avery Dennison Label and Packaging Materials and EssilorLuxottica, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3