Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BVAvanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV
VS
RumahRumah
Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

Via del Faggiolo 1/12D, Bologna, 40132, IT

Last Update: 11/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.avanzi.com
838/1000Good

Leading Company in Optical Retail Business, part of Grand Vision BV based in Amsterdam (NL) GrandVision B.V. is a leading worldwide optical retailer with various retail companies and formats in 38 countries, as of December 2009, throughout Europe, Latin America, and ...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:128
Subsidiaries:60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Rumah

Rumah

Centro, Balneário Camboriú, BR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rumah.com.br
784/1000Fair

Fundada em Junho de 2015, a Rumah é uma loja online especializada em artigos de decoração e itens para a casa, entregando seus produtos para o Brasil inteiro. Com um portfólio grande e variado, a Rumah proporciona diversas opções para seus clientes em várias categorias....

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:13,643
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rumah

Rumah

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rumah in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rumah (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rumah cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Rumah

Rumah

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV company and Rumah company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV and Rumah, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV and Rumah, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV or Rumah ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV or Rumah ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV and Rumah, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Avanzi Holding - Grand Vision BV and Rumah, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2