Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Av-Tech Industries, A Division of FastenalAv-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal
VS
BombardierBombardier
Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

N/A

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.av-techind.com/
747/1000Moderate

Av-Tech Industries is a wholesale distributor of fasteners, components, compounds, sealants, and adhesives for use in Space, Aviation, Defense, and Commercial applications. We serve a wide variety of industries including Aerospace, Aviation, Defense, Aircraft Repair, Au...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bombardier

Bombardier

400 Côte-Vertu Ouest, Dorval, H4S 1Y9, OO

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

Bombardier is a global leader in aviation, focused on designing, manufacturing, and servicing the world's most exceptional business jets. Bombardier’s Challenger and Global aircraft families are renowned for their cutting-edge innovation, cabin design, performance, and ...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:24,827
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bombardier

Bombardier

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bombardier in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bombardier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bombardier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bombardier

Bombardier

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BOM19502322

FAQ

Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal company and Bombardier company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal and Bombardier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal and Bombardier, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal or Bombardier ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal or Bombardier ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal and Bombardier, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Av-Tech Industries, A Division of Fastenal and Bombardier, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1