Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPAAutoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA
VS
Texas Health and Human ServicesTexas Health and Human Services
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

Hoge Nieuwstraat 8, The Hague, 2514 EL, NL

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

De Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens is de onafhankelijke toezichthouder op persoonsgegevens die mensen beschermt in een digitale wereld.

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:291
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

4601 W Guadalupe St. , Austin, 78751, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://hhs.texas.gov
779/1000Fair

Overview The Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) is an agency within the Texas Health and Human Services System. In September 2016, Texas began transforming how it delivers health and human services to qualified Texans, with a goal of making the Health and...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:10,817
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA has 31.03% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Health and Human Services in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Texas Health and Human Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Health and Human Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
IVAAUT1770515557
Texas Health and Human Services

Texas Health and Human Services

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA company and Texas Health and Human Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA and Texas Health and Human Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA or Texas Health and Human Services ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) | Dutch DPA and Texas Health and Human Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2