Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AutoRABITAutoRABIT
VS
TOTVSTOTVS
AutoRABIT

AutoRABIT

548 Market St, San Francisco, 94104, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.autorabit.com
753/1000Fair

AutoRABIT is the DevSecOps and security partner for enterprises navigating the complexities of Salesforce at scale. We empower regulated industries with future-proof solutions that unify security, compliance, and operational efficiency—so teams can build with confidence...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:256
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
TOTVS

TOTVS

Av Braz Leme, 1000, Sao Paulo, 02511-900, BR

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.totvs.com
766/1000Fair

Olá, somos a TOTVS! A maior empresa de tecnologia do Brasil. 🤓 Líder absoluta em sistemas e plataformas para empresas, a TOTVS possui mais de 70 mil clientes. Indo muito além do ERP, oferece tecnologia completa para digitalização dos negócios por meio de 3 unidades de...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:16,566
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AutoRABIT

AutoRABIT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TOTVS

TOTVS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AutoRABIT in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TOTVS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AutoRABIT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AutoRABIT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TOTVS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TOTVS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AutoRABIT

AutoRABIT

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
AUT1764943909
TOTVS

TOTVS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AutoRABIT company and TOTVS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AutoRABIT and TOTVS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AutoRABIT and TOTVS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AutoRABIT or TOTVS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AutoRABIT or TOTVS ?
Between AutoRABIT and TOTVS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AutoRABIT and TOTVS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3