Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Automotive | Tata Steel NederlandAutomotive | Tata Steel Nederland
VS
Magna InternationalMagna International
Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

Wenckebachstraat, Velsen-Noord, 1970 JA, NL

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
748/1000Moderate

Tata Steel supplies you with more than steel. Our engineering services support you to fully exploit the potential of steel, so that you can reduce total cost of ownership.

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:80
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Magna International

Magna International

377 Magna Drive, Aurora, Ontario, CA, L4G 7K1

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.magna.com
783/1000Fair

We see a future where everyone can live and move without limitations. That’s why we are developing technologies, systems and concepts that make vehicles safer and cleaner, while serving our communities, the planet and, above all, people. Forward. For all. Our common s...

NAICS:3361
NAICS Definition:Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:41,612
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Magna International

Magna International

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Magna International in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Magna International (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Magna International cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Magna International

Magna International

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland company and Magna International company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland and Magna International, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland or Magna International ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland or Magna International ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland and Magna International, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Automotive | Tata Steel Nederland and Magna International, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-5270
SUMMARY

An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-5269
SUMMARY

In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51808
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-51807
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-36035
SUMMARY

Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-14
UPDATED
Date2026-07-14
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA