Comparison Overview
Automate RPA

Automate RPA
N/A
Last Update: 24/04/2026
Automate makes robotic process automation (RPA) accessible to everyone from IT to business users—regardless of coding experience. With superior flexibility and scalability, easily take your automation from basic tasks to full enterprise-level deployment. Quickly build ...

Cadence
2655 Seely Avenue, San Jose, California, US, 95134
Last Update: 19/05/2026
Cadence is a market leader in AI and digital twins, pioneering the application of computational software to accelerate innovation in the engineering design of silicon to systems. Our design solutions, based on Cadence’s Intelligent System Design™ strategy, are essential...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Automate RPA







Cadence






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Automate RPA in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cadence in 2026.
Incident History - Automate RPA (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Automate RPA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cadence (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cadence cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Automate RPA

Cadence
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.