Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AutogrillAutogrill
VS
Wingstop Restaurants Inc.Wingstop Restaurants Inc.
Autogrill

Autogrill

Palazzo Z Strada 5, Rozzano - Milanofiori, Italy, 20089, IT

Last Update: 23/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.autogrill.com
776/1000Fair

Autogrill is the world’s leading provider of food & beverage services for travellers. The Group is present in 30 countries on 4 continents, operates in about 774 locations managing about 3,300 points of sale with about 46,000 employees and is present in 139 airports. A...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:4,898
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

2801 N Central Expy, Dallas, 75204, US

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

Sure, we’re The Wing Experts, but it’s our flavor that defines us. You taste it in our 12 signature sauces, you see it through our bold TV commercials, and you feel it when you walk through our doors. It’s what we like to call a flavor experience, and since the opening ...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:14,747
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Autogrill

Autogrill

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Autogrill in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Wingstop Restaurants Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Autogrill (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Autogrill cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Wingstop Restaurants Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Wingstop Restaurants Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Autogrill

Autogrill

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

Wingstop Restaurants Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Autogrill company and Wingstop Restaurants Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Autogrill and Wingstop Restaurants Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Autogrill and Wingstop Restaurants Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Autogrill or Wingstop Restaurants Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Autogrill or Wingstop Restaurants Inc. ?
Between Autogrill and Wingstop Restaurants Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Autogrill and Wingstop Restaurants Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-91201
SUMMARY

DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91200
SUMMARY

DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-91199
SUMMARY

Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-91198
SUMMARY

GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-91197
SUMMARY

Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-14
UPDATED
Date2026-09-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8