Comparison Overview
Autodesk AutoCAD

Autodesk AutoCAD
1 Market St, San Francisco, 94105, US
Last Update: 26/12/2025
The original AutoCAD 2D and 3D CAD software provides innovative tools for design and documentation. AutoCAD® now includes industry-specific features and libraries for architecture, mechanical design, electrical design, and more. With an AutoCAD subscription, work on th...

Pitney Bowes
27 Waterview Dr, Shelton, 06484, US
Last Update: 29/04/2026
Pitney Bowes is a technology-driven company that provides digital shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world – including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entiti...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Autodesk AutoCAD







Pitney Bowes






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Autodesk AutoCAD in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
Pitney Bowes has 191.26% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Autodesk AutoCAD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Autodesk AutoCAD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pitney Bowes (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pitney Bowes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Autodesk AutoCAD

Pitney Bowes
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.