Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Australian Information Security Association (AISA)

Australian Information Security Association (AISA) Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

aisa.org.au

The Australian Information Security Association (AISA) is Australia's cyber security peak body. Formed in 1999, AISA is focused on individual membership. AISA aims to foster and promote the development of the information security industry and encourage the professional development of our members. We have continued to grow our membership base in excess of 13,500+ members and extend our geographical reach across Australia. AISA caters to all domains within the information security field with focus groups, presentations at meetings and networking opportunities. AISA welcomes as members all individuals with a professional interest in information security. Our broad membership base consists of information security professionals from all


AISA A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

AISA
Company Information
Website:http://www.aisa.org.au/
Employees number:199
Number of followers:41,402
NAICS:541514
Industry Type:Computer and Network Security
Homepage:aisa.org.au
AISA Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 0 and 549
logo
AISAComputer and Network Security
Updated:
15/09/2026
301/1000
Critical
C
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
AISA Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
AISAComputer and Network Security
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

AISACritical
Current Score
301C (CRITICAL)
01000
4 incidents
-119 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
SEPTEMBER 2026
316Before Incident
Cyber Attack
31 Aug 2026AISA
Australian Taxation Office, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Commonwealth Bank and Australian Banking Association: 4 in 5 SMEs report being exposed to scams

Australian SMEs Face Growing Threat from Scammers

296After Incident
CRITICAL-20
AUSCOMAUSAUS1788224259
Australian SMEs Face Growing Threat from Scammers as Cybercriminals Exploit Vulnerabilities Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Australia are increasingly targeted by scammers, with cybercriminals leveraging impersonation tactics, fake invoices, and remote access schemes to steal funds and sensitive data. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) and Pyxis polling, 62% of businesses with 1–4 employees and 84% of those with 5–19 staff maintain an online presence, making them prime targets for fraud. The Australian Banking Association (ABA) has warned that scammers exploit the busy schedules of business owners, often tricking them with convincing fake invoices or impersonating trusted suppliers. A single fraudulent transaction can devastate smaller operators, with ABA CEO Simon Birmingham noting that criminals actively seek weaknesses in everyday business processes. Three common scam types highlighted by the ABA include: - Fake invoice scams: Fraudulent invoices mimicking legitimate suppliers but with scammer-controlled bank details. - Remote access scams: Criminals posing as tech support or banks to gain control of company systems and credentials. - Business impersonation scams: Fraudsters impersonating businesses to defraud customers, risking reputational damage. ABA research reveals that 30% of businesses had a suspicious transaction flagged by their bank in the past year, while 20% reported a blocked transaction. Banks are enhancing protections, including the rollout of Confirmation of Payee a system designed to verify payee details before transactions are processed. However, behavioral research from CommBank’s Behavioural Science Centre of Excellence indicates that many Australians attempt to handle scams alone rather than seeking input from colleagues or trusted contacts. A striking 72% of scammed employees did not discuss the incident with others before realizing it was fraud. Additionally, 63% of business owners cited barriers to discussing scams, including concerns about alarming customers, time constraints, and perceived lack of responsibility. CommBank’s fraud and scams executive, James Roberts, emphasized that scammers exploit isolation, pressuring victims into quick decisions without verification. Behavioral scientist Caitlin Court added that sharing near-miss experiences such as spotting a suspicious email can help others recognize similar threats. Separately, the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) confirmed it is assisting tax professionals targeted by cybercriminals, primarily through malicious email links and attachments. The ATO’s response follows reports of malware infections affecting practitioners, underscoring the broader risk of phishing attacks across industries.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Scam, Phishing, Fraud
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData theft
IMPACT
Financial Loss: Devastating for smaller operators (single fraudulent transaction)Data Compromised: Sensitive data, credentials, payment informationSystems Affected: Company systems (via remote access scams)Operational Impact: Disruption of business processes, reputational damageBrand Reputation Impact: Risk of reputational damage (business impersonation scams)Payment Information Risk: Fraudulent transactions, scammer-controlled bank details
DATA BREACH
CredentialsPayment informationSensitive business dataSensitivity Of Data: High (personally identifiable information, financial data)Personally Identifiable Information: Potentially (via phishing/malware)
AUGUST 2026
585Before Incident
Ransomware
01 Aug 2026AISA
Australian medical center: 32 Ransomware Attacks Every Day as Global Threat Hits Record High

Record-Breaking Ransomware Surge in August 2026

305After Incident
CRITICAL-280
AUS1789461539
Record-Breaking Ransomware Surge in August 2026: Key Trends and Impacts August 2026 marked a historic peak in global ransomware activity, with 997 attacks recorded worldwide a 23% increase from July and surpassing the previous monthly record of 988 set in February 2025. The surge averaged 32 attacks per day, with businesses bearing the brunt of the assault. ### Sector-Specific Trends - Businesses accounted for 861 attacks (up 24% from July), while government entities saw 39 incidents, a slight rise from 38 in July. - Utilities experienced the sharpest spike, with attacks doubling from 5 to 10. - Healthcare faced a 30% increase, rising to 69 attacks, including confirmed incidents in the U.S., Canada, Denmark, Australia, Guatemala, and Italy. One Australian medical center received a $376,000 ransom demand (6 bitcoin). - Finance (40% increase), technology (42%), and law firms (52%) also saw significant rises, while retail (30%) and manufacturing (23%) were heavily targeted. - Education and food & beverage were among the few sectors with declining activity. ### Geographical Hotspots - The U.S. saw a 28% increase, with one ransomware group driving a substantial share of claims. - Italy and Taiwan recorded the largest jumps both 200% increases rising from 16 to 48 and 7 to 21 attacks, respectively. - Germany (14% increase) and the U.K. (44%) also saw notable rises, while India’s attacks climbed 20%. ### Notable Incidents - A U.S. town’s ransomware attack disrupted local schools, while a German government entity faced a $2.3 million ransom demand (30 bitcoin) for 5.79 TB of stolen data refused by authorities. - Finance and tech firms were hit hard, with confirmed attacks in Japan, India, the U.S., and South Africa. One Japanese company lost 437 GB of data, while a South African firm had 100 GB stolen. ### Year-to-Date Trends From January to August 2026, 270 government attacks were recorded (vs. 267 in the same 2025 period), with 124 confirmed incidents this year. The surge underscores ransomware’s expanding reach, with healthcare, utilities, and critical infrastructure facing escalating threats often resulting in operational disruptions, data theft, and high-stakes ransom demands.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData exfiltration
IMPACT
$376,000 (Australian medical center)$2.3 million (German government entity)5.79 TB (German government entity)437 GB (Japanese company)100 GB (South African firm)Disrupted local schools (U.S. town)Operational disruptions in healthcare, utilities, and critical infrastructure
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable InformationSensitive business dataSensitivity Of Data: High5.79 TB (German government entity)437 GB (Japanese company)100 GB (South African firm)
JULY 2026
699Before Incident
Ransomware
24 Jul 2026AISA
Australian organizations: AI makes ransomware more effective in Australia study

AI-Powered Ransomware Attacks Escalate in Australia

585After Incident
CRITICAL-114
AUS1784867103
AI-Powered Ransomware Attacks Escalate in Australia, Proofpoint Research Reveals A recent study by Proofpoint highlights the growing threat of AI-enhanced ransomware attacks targeting Australian organizations. According to the research, two-thirds (67%) of affected Australian entities reported that artificial intelligence made ransomware incidents significantly or somewhat more effective, with 26% stating AI had a significant impact on attack success. The findings, based on a survey of 953 security professionals across 12 countries including Australia reveal that data theft is now a primary objective alongside encryption. In Australia, 70% of ransomware victims confirmed that attackers stole data during the incident, reinforcing a shift toward extortion-based models where stolen information is used for repeat demands or resale. Human-Centric Attack Vectors Dominate The study underscores that attackers continue to exploit human vulnerabilities, with phishing and email-based social engineering accounting for 37% of initial breaches in Australia. Malicious attachments and links (47%) and business email compromise (38%) were the most common entry points, while 41% of respondents cited the attack’s apparent authenticity as the reason it bypassed defenses. Ryan Kalember, Proofpoint’s Chief Strategy Officer, noted that AI has not fundamentally altered ransomware but has refined the tactics leading to it such as crafting highly convincing phishing emails and credential theft campaigns at scale. Extortion Persists Even After Payment Nearly half (49%) of affected Australian organizations paid a ransom, yet 51% of those faced a second extortion demand. The data aligns with global trends where attackers leverage stolen data for ongoing pressure, including threats of public disclosure. Adrian Covich, Proofpoint’s APJ Vice President of Systems Engineering, emphasized the challenge of distinguishing malicious communications from legitimate ones, particularly as AI improves impersonation. The findings suggest that traditional endpoint security and recovery plans are insufficient without robust protections for employees, identities, and trusted communication channels. The report also found that only 11% of Australian victims saw no evidence of AI involvement in attacks, signaling its near-ubiquitous role in modern ransomware operations.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Ransomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData extortionResale of stolen data
DATA BREACH
Stolen dataPersonally identifiable informationSensitivity Of Data: High
JUNE 2026
698Before Incident
MAY 2026
696Before Incident
APRIL 2026
696Before Incident
MARCH 2026
693Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
693Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
753Before Incident
Breach
06 Jan 2026AISA
CRRC MA, K3G and Australian NBN: Dozens of Major Data Breaches Linked to Single Threat Actor

Zestix/Sentap Initial Access Broker Campaign

691After Incident
CRITICAL-62
CRRTESAUS1767704662
Cybersecurity Alert: Threat Actor Zestix/Sentap Exploits Stolen Credentials in Major Data Breaches A threat actor known as Zestix—also linked to the online persona Sentap—has been identified as an initial access broker (IAB) behind multiple high-profile data breaches, according to cybersecurity firm Hudson Rock. Active since late 2024–early 2025, Zestix’s operations trace back to Sentap’s activities dating to 2021, with both personas leveraging stolen credentials to infiltrate enterprise networks. ### Attack Method & Victim Profile Zestix/Sentap targets organizations across aerospace, government infrastructure, legal, robotics, and defense sectors, exploiting credentials harvested from information stealers like RedLine, Lumma, and Vidar. These credentials—some freshly stolen, others lingering in logs for years—were used to breach file-transfer services such as ShareFile, OwnCloud, and Nextcloud, often due to missing multi-factor authentication (MFA). The actor has successfully compromised systems roughly 50 times, exfiltrating data for sale on Russian-language hacker forums or auctioning access to the networks themselves. ### Notable Breaches & Financial Impact Zestix has claimed responsibility for large-scale breaches, including: - Iberia (Spanish flag carrier) – 77 GB of data, listed for $150,000 - Pickett & Associates (engineering firm for energy orgs) - Intecro Robotics (aerospace/defense equipment) - Maida Health (Brazilian military police contractor) - CRRC MA (rolling stock manufacturer) - Pan-Pacific Mechanical (1.04 TB), Bradley R. Tyer & Associates (1.02 TB), and The Providence Group (1 TB) Under the Sentap alias, the actor’s victim list expands further, though Hudson Rock could not confirm all breaches stemmed from infostealer infections. ### Broader Infostealer Threat The incident underscores the persistent risk of information stealers, which Hudson Rock warns have exposed credentials for thousands of organizations using ShareFile, OwnCloud, and Nextcloud, including Deloitte, Honeywell, KPMG, Samsung, and Walmart. These attacks thrive on malware-as-a-service (MaaS), enabling even unskilled actors to deploy stealers that exfiltrate data in minutes before self-deleting, leaving minimal forensic traces. The commodification of cybercrime—where stolen credentials fuel credential stuffing, identity theft, and fraud—continues to drive large-scale breaches, with no immediate solution in sight.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachInitial Access Broker (IAB) ActivityRansomware
MOTIVATION
Financial gainData exfiltration and saleInitial access brokerage
IMPACT
Data Compromised: 77 GB (Iberia), 1.04 TB (Pan-Pacific Mechanical), 1.02 TB (Bradley R. Tyer & Associates), 1 TB (The Providence Group), 306 GB (Australian NBN), 275 GB (UrbanX.io), and othersShareFileOwnCloudNextcloudEnterprise networksOperational Impact: Unauthorized access to sensitive file repositories, data exfiltration, and potential ransomware deploymentBrand Reputation Impact: High (public disclosure of breaches, data sales on dark web)Identity Theft Risk: High (PII exposure)
DATA BREACH
CredentialsSensitive filesPersonally Identifiable Information (PII)Sensitivity Of Data: High (corporate, military, healthcare, and infrastructure data)
DECEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
753Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
753Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for AISA ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in July 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on AISA's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with AISA ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view AISA's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?