Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Australian High Commission, SingaporeAustralian High Commission, Singapore
VS
eThekwini MunicipalityeThekwini Municipality
Australian High Commission, Singapore

Australian High Commission, Singapore

25 Napier Road, Singapore, Singapore , 258507, SG

Last Update: 07/01/2026

View Profile
758/1000Fair

The Australian High Commission is the official representative of the Australian Government in Singapore. In 2025, we will mark 60 years of friendship between Australia and Singapore. 🇦🇺🇸🇬 The Australian High Commission provide a range of services to the general p...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:47
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
eThekwini Municipality

eThekwini Municipality

City Hall,, 263 Pixley KaSeme Street,, Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, ZA, 4000

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.durban.gov.za
777/1000Fair

EThekwini Municipality is a Metropolitan Municipality found in the South African province of KwaZulu-Natal. Home to the world-famous city of Durban. EThekwini is the largest City in the province and the third largest city in the country. It is a sophisticated cosmopolit...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:12,086
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Australian High Commission, Singapore

Australian High Commission, Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
eThekwini Municipality

eThekwini Municipality

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Australian High Commission, Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for eThekwini Municipality in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Australian High Commission, Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Australian High Commission, Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - eThekwini Municipality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

eThekwini Municipality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Australian High Commission, Singapore

Australian High Commission, Singapore

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
eThekwini Municipality

eThekwini Municipality

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ETH1517622

FAQ

Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore company and eThekwini Municipality company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore and eThekwini Municipality, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore and eThekwini Municipality, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Australian High Commission, Singapore or eThekwini Municipality ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Australian High Commission, Singapore or eThekwini Municipality ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore and eThekwini Municipality, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Australian High Commission, Singapore and eThekwini Municipality, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8