Comparison Overview
Auckland Transport

Auckland Transport
20 Viaduct Harbour, Auckland, 1010, NZ
Last Update: 03/04/2026
Auckland Transport is a growing organisation responsible for planning and funding local public transport, operating the local roading network and managing the Auckland regions parking and traffic systems. We are passionate about providing Auckland with an integrated ...

South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Lehae La Sars, Pretoria, 0001, ZA
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection a...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Auckland Transport







South African Revenue Service (SARS)






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Auckland Transport in 2026.
Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2026.
Incident History - Auckland Transport (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Auckland Transport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Auckland Transport

South African Revenue Service (SARS)
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.