Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AT&T Public SectorAT&T Public Sector
VS
Ooredoo GroupOoredoo Group
AT&T Public Sector

AT&T Public Sector

Washington, 20001, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
750/1000Fair

No company is more invested in America’s future than AT&T. We’re investing billions into the economy, providing quality jobs to over 200,000 people in the U.S. alone. We’re supporting the veterans who make our country stronger and providing disaster relief support to th...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ooredoo Group

Ooredoo Group

100 West Bay, Doha, Doha, QA, Po Box 217

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ooredoo.com
783/1000Fair

We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:31,407
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AT&T Public Sector

AT&T Public Sector

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ooredoo Group

Ooredoo Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AT&T Public Sector in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ooredoo Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AT&T Public Sector (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T Public Sector cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ooredoo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ooredoo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AT&T Public Sector

AT&T Public Sector

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ooredoo Group

Ooredoo Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AT&T Public Sector company and Ooredoo Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AT&T Public Sector and Ooredoo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AT&T Public Sector and Ooredoo Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AT&T Public Sector or Ooredoo Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AT&T Public Sector or Ooredoo Group ?
Between AT&T Public Sector and Ooredoo Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AT&T Public Sector and Ooredoo Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3