Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Atrium CentersAtrium Centers
VS
Rangely District HospitalRangely District Hospital
Atrium Centers

Atrium Centers

2550 Corporate Exchange Dr, Suite 200, Columbus, Ohio, US, 43231

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
704/1000Moderate

Atrium Centers is an award-winning, 100% employee-owned skilled nursing provider, offering short-term, post-acute rehabilitation and long-term nursing care in Ohio, Michigan, Wisconsin and Kentucky. With every team member deeply invested in our success, we take an all...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:163
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Rangely District Hospital

Rangely District Hospital

225 Eagle Crest Drive, Rangely, 81648-2104, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Rangely District Hospital is a 25 bed Critical Access Hospital and Level IV Trauma Center, located at 225 Eagle Crest Drive, Rangely, CO, 81648.

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:66
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atrium Centers

Atrium Centers

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Rangely District Hospital

Rangely District Hospital

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atrium Centers in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rangely District Hospital in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atrium Centers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atrium Centers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Rangely District Hospital (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rangely District Hospital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atrium Centers

Atrium Centers

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATR1765174764
Rangely District Hospital

Rangely District Hospital

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
RAN2105123

FAQ

Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atrium Centers company and Rangely District Hospital company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atrium Centers and Rangely District Hospital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atrium Centers and Rangely District Hospital, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atrium Centers or Rangely District Hospital ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atrium Centers or Rangely District Hospital ?
Between Atrium Centers and Rangely District Hospital, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atrium Centers and Rangely District Hospital, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA