Comparison Overview
Atonix Digital

Atonix Digital
Overland Park, 66211, US
Last Update: 10/03/2026
Atonix Digital offers digital insights by connecting the power of math and data through a portfolio of products that help simplify asset management by optimizing performance, improving reliability, detecting emerging risks and providing an easily justifiable return on y...

Wolters Kluwer
Zuidpoolsingel 2, Alphen aan den Rijn, 2400 BA, NL
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Wolters Kluwer (EURONEXT: WKL) is a global leader in information, software solutions, and services for professionals in healthcare; tax and accounting; financial and corporate compliance; legal and regulatory; corporate performance and ESG. We help our customers make cr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Atonix Digital







Wolters Kluwer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Atonix Digital in 2026.
Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Wolters Kluwer in 2026.
Incident History - Atonix Digital (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atonix Digital cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Wolters Kluwer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Wolters Kluwer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Atonix Digital

Wolters Kluwer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.