Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Atlas AirAtlas Air
VS
Lufthansa GroupLufthansa Group
Atlas Air

Atlas Air

1 N Lexington Avenue, White Plains, 10601, US

Last Update: 13/03/2026

View Profile
667/1000Weak

Atlas Air Worldwide is a leading global provider of outsourced aircraft and aviation operating services. It is the parent company of Atlas Air, Inc. and Titan Aviation Holdings, Inc., and is the majority shareholder of Polar Air Cargo Worldwide, Inc. Our companies opera...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:3,466
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Lufthansa Group

Lufthansa Group

Airportring, Frankfurt, 60546, DE

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://lufthansagroup.com
725/1000Moderate

The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, ...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:49,376
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atlas Air

Atlas Air

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lufthansa Group

Lufthansa Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Atlas Air has 55.36% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lufthansa Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atlas Air (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Air cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lufthansa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lufthansa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atlas Air

Atlas Air

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ATLTSU1770921536
Lufthansa Group

Lufthansa Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HIT2032020092925

FAQ

Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atlas Air company and Lufthansa Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atlas Air and Lufthansa Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atlas Air and Lufthansa Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atlas Air or Lufthansa Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atlas Air or Lufthansa Group ?
Between Atlas Air and Lufthansa Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atlas Air and Lufthansa Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3