What is the official website of Atlantic Rack ?

The official website of Atlantic Rack is http://www.atlanticrack.com.

What is Atlantic Rack's cybersecurity risk score?

Atlantic Rack has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 750 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Atlantic Rack experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Atlantic Rack been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Atlantic Rack have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Atlantic Rack have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Atlantic Rack comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Atlantic Rack have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Atlantic Rack comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Atlantic Rack is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Atlantic Rack have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Atlantic Rack is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Atlantic Rack operate in ?

Atlantic Rack operates primarily in the Warehousing industry.

How many employees does Atlantic Rack have ?

Atlantic Rack employs approximately 17 people worldwide.

Does Atlantic Rack own any subsidiaries ?

Atlantic Rack presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Atlantic Rack have ?

Atlantic Rack's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 645 followers.

Does Atlantic Rack have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, Atlantic Rack does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does Atlantic Rack have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Atlantic Rack maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/atlantic-rack.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Atlantic Rack experienced ?

As of July 26, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Atlantic Rack has experienced 1 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Atlantic Rack have ?

Atlantic Rack has an estimated 168 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has Atlantic Rack faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Vulnerability.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Atlantic Rack

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

750

/1000

Fair

775

/1000

Fair

Atlantic Rack Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

atlanticrack.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

Atlantic Rack is leader in warehouse equipment and integration. Supplying the best quality material handling products in the industry. We service the US territory, Central America & The Caribbean. We represent the best manufacturers of pallet racks and Material handling industry equipment in the USA, including Interlake Mecalux. Atlantic Rack specializes in optimizing warehouse space focusing on customer needs by using different storage solutions like; selective pallet rack, drive in pallet rack, push back pallet rack, cantilever rack, pallet flow and warehouse shelving. Our products include plastic bins, industrial lockers, in-plant offices, mezzanines, conveyors and much more. Our mission is to grow with our customers and provide

Atlantic Rack A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Atlantic Rack

Atlantic Rack CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

Atlantic Rack

Vulnerability

4/2025

ATL838042725

Loading…

A.I.

Atlantic Rack Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Atlantic Rack

Incidents vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Rack in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Rack in 2026.

Incident Types Atlantic Rack vs Warehousing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlantic Rack in 2026.

Incident History - Atlantic Rack (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Atlantic Rack Subsidiaries

Parent Company

Atlantic Rack

Warehousing

Website: http://www.atlanticrack.com

Company Size: 17

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

Atlantic Rack Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

Atlantic Rack CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 23, 2024 07:00 AM

Cybersecurity breach at Giant Tiger involves customer's personal information

Canadian discount store chain Giant Tiger is warning of a recent cybersecurity breach involving customer's information.

Read Article

October 04, 2021 07:00 AM

A system of systems: Cooperation on maritime cybersecurity

This report segments the MTS into three discrete systems—ships, ports, and cargo—each with its own life cycle...

Read Article

August 22, 2018 07:00 AM

The Untold Story of NotPetya, the Most Devastating Cyberattack in History

Crippled ports. Paralyzed corporations. Frozen government agencies. How a single piece of code crashed the world.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-10681

SUMMARY

In Zephyr's userspace dynamic-objects subsystem, thread_idx_alloc() in kernel/userspace/userspace.c allocated a new thread permission index from the global _thread_idx_map[] bitmap without holding lists_lock. On SMP systems, two user-mode threads invoking the k_object_alloc(K_OBJ_THREAD) syscall concurrently can both observe the same low free bit, perform the same non-atomic RMW to clear it, and return the identical tidx. The two newly created K_OBJ_THREAD objects are then assigned the same thread_id, so the two user threads alias a single bit position in every kernel object's perms[] bitfield: any subsequent grant of access on a kernel object to one thread is implicitly a grant to the other, defeating userspace ACL isolation. A secondary lost-update window between the unlocked &=~BIT() in alloc and the locked |= BIT() in thread_idx_free() can also leak entries from the thread-index pool. The defect is reachable from any user-mode thread via the unrestricted __syscall k_object_alloc and is gated on CONFIG_USERSPACE, CONFIG_DYNAMIC_OBJECTS, and CONFIG_SMP. The flaw was introduced when the per-thread permission index was added in 2018 and is present in every release up to and including v4.4.0. Fixed by holding lists_lock across the bitmap RMW and the permissions clear (and inlining the obj_list traversal that previously took the lock itself).

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.5

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L

Impact Score

5.5

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66013

SUMMARY

OpenRemote before 1.26.2 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the console registration API that allows unauthenticated attackers to update existing console assets by supplying a known asset identifier. Attackers can overwrite push notification tokens and console metadata without authentication or ownership validation, redirecting notifications or denying delivery to legitimate consoles.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66012

SUMMARY

SiYuan before v3.7.2 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in the POST /mcp kernel endpoint, which is gated only by a general auth check (model.CheckAuth) with no admin-role or read-only enforcement. This exposes 31 MCP tools, including a file tool with list/read/write/delete/rename/copy actions across the entire workspace. When the Publish server is enabled in anonymous mode (Conf.Publish.Enable=true and Conf.Publish.Auth.Enable=false), the Publish reverse proxy attaches an anonymous RoleReader JWT to proxied requests, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to reach /mcp. The attacker can read conf/conf.json to extract accessAuthCode, api.token, and cookieKey in plaintext, write arbitrary files in the workspace, and plant a plugin into data/plugins/ that executes with nodeIntegration:true and no contextIsolation on the next desktop launch, leading to administrator takeover.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)

cvss3

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 10.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-66011

SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-27 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the magick command-line interface when invalid options are provided. Attackers can trigger memory exhaustion by repeatedly supplying malformed command-line arguments to consume system resources.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)

cvss3

Base Score: 3.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 4.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

1.4

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-64529

SUMMARY

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: crypto: qat - remove unused character device and IOCTLs The QAT driver exposes a character device (qat_adf_ctl) with IOCTLs for device configuration, start, stop, status query and enumeration. These IOCTLs are not part of any public uAPI header and have no known in-tree or out-of-tree users. Device lifecycle is already managed via sysfs. The ioctl interface also increases the attack surface and is the subject of a number of bug reports. Remove the character device, the IOCTL definitions, and the related data structures (adf_dev_status_info, adf_user_cfg_key_val, adf_user_cfg_section, adf_user_cfg_ctl_data). Drop the now-unused adf_cfg_user.h header and strip adf_ctl_drv.c down to the minimal module_init/module_exit hooks for workqueue, AER, and crypto/compression algorithm registration. Clean up leftover dead code that was only reachable from the removed IOCTL paths: adf_cfg_del_all(), adf_devmgr_verify_id(), adf_devmgr_get_num_dev(), adf_devmgr_get_dev_by_id(), adf_get_vf_real_id() and the unused ADF_CFG macros. Additionally, drop the entry associated to QAT IOCTLs in ioctl-number.rst.

Published

Date2026-07-25

Updated

Date2026-07-25

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…