Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Federal Reserve Bank of AtlantaFederal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
VS
The Citco Group LimitedThe Citco Group Limited
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

1000 Peachtree Street NE, Atlanta, 30309, US

Last Update: 17/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atlantafed.org
753/1000Fair

The Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta is one of 12 regional Reserve Banks that, along with the Board of Governors, make up the Federal Reserve System. The Atlanta Fed covers the Sixth Federal Reserve District, which includes Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, and parts of Lou...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,574
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
The Citco Group Limited

The Citco Group Limited

89 Nexus Way, 2nd Floor Camana Bay,, Grand Cayman, KY1-1205, KY

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.citco.com
781/1000Fair

Our heritage, since founding a civil law notary practice in the 1940s to establishing the Curacao International Trust Company in the 1960s, is built on challenging paradigms and delivering exceptional service within the financial and professional services industry. Toda...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:12,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Citco Group Limited

The Citco Group Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Citco Group Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Citco Group Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Citco Group Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MICATL1786962683
The Citco Group Limited

The Citco Group Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta company and The Citco Group Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and The Citco Group Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and The Citco Group Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta or The Citco Group Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta or The Citco Group Limited ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and The Citco Group Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta and The Citco Group Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93436
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93435
SUMMARY

redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-87701
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-85917
SUMMARY

Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-85889
SUMMARY

Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-17
UPDATED
Date2026-09-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9