Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Atlanta Gas LightAtlanta Gas Light
VS
EnedisEnedis
Atlanta Gas Light

Atlanta Gas Light

10 Peachtree Place, Atlanta, GA, 30309, US

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://atlantagaslight.com/
756/1000Fair

Atlanta Gas Light is the largest natural gas distributor in the Southeast. It provides delivery service to approximately 1.55 million residential, commercial and industrial customers in Georgia. Atlanta Gas Light's role in Georgia's deregulated environment includes: ...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:482
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Enedis

Enedis

4 place de la Pyramide, Puteaux, FR, 92800

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.enedis.fr/
784/1000Fair

Enedis est le gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité sur 95 % du territoire français continental. Ses 38 859 collaborateurs assurent chaque jour l’exploitation, l’entretien et le développement de près de 1,3 million de kilomètres de réseau. Raccord...

NAICS:22
NAICS Definition:Utilities
Employees:23,409
Subsidiaries:35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atlanta Gas Light

Atlanta Gas Light

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Enedis

Enedis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Gas Light in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enedis in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atlanta Gas Light (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Gas Light cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Enedis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enedis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atlanta Gas Light

Atlanta Gas Light

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Enedis

Enedis

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light company and Enedis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light and Enedis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light and Enedis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atlanta Gas Light or Enedis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atlanta Gas Light or Enedis ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light and Enedis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atlanta Gas Light and Enedis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3