Comparison Overview

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center

VS

Indianapolis Zoo

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center

535 Means St NW, Atlanta, GA, 30318, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.thecontemporary.org

The Atlanta Contemporary Art Center, founded in 1973 as a grassroots artist’s cooperative known as Nexus, is a dynamic non-collecting arts institution that plays a vital role in Atlanta’s cultural landscape. We exhibit the work of consequential artists from local, regional, national, and international art scenes, creating in various media, and exploring a broad range of content. We pay particular attention to artists who have not had significant exhibitions in the Southeast. Our public programs include talks, lectures, panel discussions, workshops, screenings, tours, and events which foster appreciation and understanding in diverse audiences. In addition to our programming, ACAC supports working artists by providing subsidized studio space at reasonable rates, fostering a collaborative environment supportive of the creative process.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Indianapolis Zoo

1200 W. Washington Street, Indianapolis, IN, 46222, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.indianapoliszoo.com

Opened in 1964, the Indianapolis Zoo is the largest privately funded zoo in the nation. Located near downtown in White River State Park since 1988, the 93-acre Zoo was the first to be triple accredited by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums and the American Alliance of Museums as a zoo, an aquarium and a botanic garden. Hosting more than a million visitors annually, the Zoo has also emerged as a global leader in animal conservation and research, receiving international recognition for work with conservation and breeding programs including the world’s first successful artificial insemination of an African elephant. Funding from the Indianapolis Zoo also supports the efforts of animal conservation organizations around the globe. At the Zoo, guests can connect year-round with nearly 1,300 animals within living habitats that closely resemble their native regions of the globe. The beautiful 3.3-acre White River Gardens is also part of the Zoo and continues its tradition of connecting animals, plants and people.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 374
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary-art-center.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Indianapolis Zoo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlanta Contemporary Art Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Indianapolis Zoo in 2026.

Incident History — Atlanta Contemporary Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlanta Contemporary Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Indianapolis Zoo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indianapolis Zoo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlanta-contemporary-art-center.jpeg
Atlanta Contemporary Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/indianapolis-zoological-society.jpeg
Indianapolis Zoo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Indianapolis Zoo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Indianapolis Zoo company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company.

In the current year, Indianapolis Zoo company and Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Indianapolis Zoo company nor Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company nor Indianapolis Zoo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Indianapolis Zoo company employs more people globally than Atlanta Contemporary Art Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Atlanta Contemporary Art Center nor Indianapolis Zoo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References