Comparison Overview

AtkinsRéalis

VS

Technip Energies

AtkinsRéalis

455 René-Lévesque Blvd W, Montreal, QC, H2Z 1Z3, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.atkinsrealis.com

We are a world-class engineering services and nuclear organization. We connect people, data and technology to transform the world’s infrastructure and energy systems. Together, with our industry partners and clients, and our global team of consultants, designers, engineers and project managers, we can change the world. ---

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 45,467
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Technip Energies

Paris, FR
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ten.com

Technip Energies is a global technology and engineering powerhouse. With leadership positions in LNG, hydrogen, ethylene, sustainable chemistry, and CO2 management, we are contributing to the development of critical markets such as energy, energy derivatives, decarbonization, and circularity. Our complementary business segments, Technology, Products and Services (TPS) and Project Delivery, turn innovation into scalable and industrial reality. Through collaboration and excellence in execution, our 17,000+ employees across 34 countries are fully committed to bridging prosperity with sustainability for a world designed to last.

NAICS: 54139
NAICS Definition: Engineering Services
Employees: 16,420
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinsrealis.jpeg
AtkinsRéalis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technip-energies.jpeg
Technip Energies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AtkinsRéalis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Technip Energies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AtkinsRéalis in 2025.

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Technip Energies in 2025.

Incident History — AtkinsRéalis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AtkinsRéalis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Technip Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Technip Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atkinsrealis.jpeg
AtkinsRéalis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/technip-energies.jpeg
Technip Energies
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

AtkinsRéalis company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Technip Energies company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Technip Energies company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to AtkinsRéalis company.

In the current year, Technip Energies company and AtkinsRéalis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Technip Energies company nor AtkinsRéalis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Technip Energies company nor AtkinsRéalis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Technip Energies company nor AtkinsRéalis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither AtkinsRéalis company nor Technip Energies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

AtkinsRéalis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Technip Energies company.

AtkinsRéalis company employs more people globally than Technip Energies company, reflecting its scale as a Engineering Services.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AtkinsRéalis nor Technip Energies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References