Comparison Overview
ATI Physical Therapy

ATI Physical Therapy
2001 Butterfield Rd, Downers Grove, 60515, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
With over 30 years’ experience and approximately 850 locations nationwide, ATI Physical Therapy prides itself on being at the forefront of patient care and customer service for the physical therapy industry. How do we do this? Through our dedication to ongoing research,...

Massage Envy
14350 N. 87th St., Suite 200, Scottsdale, 85260, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Massage Envy is a leading wellness franchise providing professional massage, skin care, and assisted stretch services nationwide. Co-founded by a massage therapist in 2002, the brand’s mission is simple: make total body care accessible and affordable so people can feel ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ATI Physical Therapy







Massage Envy






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ATI Physical Therapy in 2026.
Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Massage Envy in 2026.
Incident History - ATI Physical Therapy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ATI Physical Therapy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Massage Envy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Massage Envy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ATI Physical Therapy

Massage Envy
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.