Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023
VS
T-MobileT-Mobile
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Houston, US

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
809/1000Good

In Athonet, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise acquisition, we create best in class, reliable and future-proof solutions to enable the full potential of private networks for each of our clients through solid and durable mobile core. We provide a 5G and LTE mobile platform f...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
T-Mobile

T-Mobile

12920 SE 38th St, Bellevue, 98006, US

Last Update: 26/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://t-mobile.com
428/1000Critical

As the supercharged Un-carrier, T-Mobile US, Inc. (NASDAQ: TMUS) is powered by an award-winning 5G network that connects more people, in more places, than ever before. With T-Mobile’s unique value proposition of best network, best value, and best experiences, the Un-car...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:95,423
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
21
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
T-Mobile

T-Mobile

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

T-Mobile has 296.04% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - T-Mobile (X = Date, Y = Severity)

T-Mobile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
T-Mobile

T-Mobile

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
T-M1789446415
🔒 Incident : Breach
T-M1775514990
🔒 Incident : Breach
T-M1774995874

FAQ

Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and T-Mobile company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and T-Mobile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and T-Mobile, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or T-Mobile ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or T-Mobile ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and T-Mobile, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and T-Mobile, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103761
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a memory exhaustion vulnerability in TransferMetadata::receivePeerNotify that allows unauthenticated attackers to grow process memory without limit. Attackers can repeatedly send notify frames up to 1 MB to the handshake RPC port, filling the uncapped notifys vector until the out-of-memory killer terminates the engine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-103760
SUMMARY

Mooncake transfer engine through 0.3.13.post1 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to block the handshake daemon by never reading replies. Attackers can send a Metadata request to the handshake RPC port and stall SocketHandShakePlugin's single listener thread in writeFully(), breaking all subsequent handshakes, metadata fetches, notify and probe requests.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2025-71427
SUMMARY

Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86344
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in 389-ds-base. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a complete LDAP operation followed by the first bytes of an incomplete LDAPMessage on the same connection, causing the server to hand that connection to a second worker thread before the first worker's result is flushed. The second worker blocks until nsslapd-ioblocktimeout while holding the connection mutex, preventing delivery of the completed operation's result. Repeating this across a small number of connections proportional to the configured worker-thread pool size exhausts the entire pool under default configuration, denying service to all clients (anonymous and authenticated, plaintext and TLS) for as long as the attacker maintains the connections.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-71454
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in CWE-79 - Cross-site Scripting CAPEC-63 allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects CAPEC-63: before 3.0b63.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-01
UPDATED
Date2026-10-01
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA