Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023
VS
BT GroupBT Group
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Houston, US

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
809/1000Good

In Athonet, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise acquisition, we create best in class, reliable and future-proof solutions to enable the full potential of private networks for each of our clients through solid and durable mobile core. We provide a 5G and LTE mobile platform f...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BT Group

BT Group

One Braham, London, E1 8EE, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.bt.com/about
747/1000Moderate

We’re one of the world’s leading communications services companies. At BT Group, the solutions we sell are integral to modern life. Our purpose is as simple as it is ambitious: we connect for good. There are no limits to what people can do when they connect. And as te...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:73,915
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BT Group

BT Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BT Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BT Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BT Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BT Group

BT Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
BT000120524

FAQ

Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and BT Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and BT Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and BT Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or BT Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or BT Group ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and BT Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and BT Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9