Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023
VS
AT&TAT&T
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Houston, US

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
809/1000Good

In Athonet, a Hewlett Packard Enterprise acquisition, we create best in class, reliable and future-proof solutions to enable the full potential of private networks for each of our clients through solid and durable mobile core. We provide a 5G and LTE mobile platform f...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:23
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AT&T

AT&T

208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US

Last Update: 17/06/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.att.com
100/1000Critical

We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:178,894
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
8
Known data breaches
27
Attack type number
4

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AT&T

AT&T

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

AT&T has 654.72% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AT&T

AT&T

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ATTIBM1781168591
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
OKTMICATTNVI1780611852
🔒 Incident : Breach
METORATICBANYAHATTADOAPPCOLGOO1777962591

FAQ

Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 company and AT&T company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and AT&T, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or AT&T ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 or AT&T ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and AT&T, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Athonet, acquired by Hewlett Packard Enterprise company in 2023 and AT&T, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8