Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AthletaAthleta
VS
MAS HoldingsMAS Holdings
Athleta

Athleta

1 Harrison St, San Francisco, US

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.athleta.com
769/1000Fair

We believe that being fit and active makes life richer and bigger than it could possibly be otherwise. And we’re always looking for people who share our passion for leading an active lifestyle, growing personally as well as professionally, and creating game-changing pro...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:2,946
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
MAS Holdings

MAS Holdings

Level 10, Aitken Spence Tower 2 Vauxhall Street Colombo, Colombo, LK

Last Update: 26/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.masholdings.com
784/1000Fair

MAS is an innovation driven company founded on a perfect blend of daring and visionary thinking. Focusing on fashion and lifestyle, we are one of Asia’s largest manufacturers of intimate apparel, sportswear, performance wear and swimwear and provide IT solutions to the ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10,001
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Athleta

Athleta

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
MAS Holdings

MAS Holdings

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Athleta in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Apparel & Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MAS Holdings in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Athleta (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Athleta cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - MAS Holdings (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MAS Holdings cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Athleta

Athleta

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
MAS Holdings

MAS Holdings

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Athleta company and MAS Holdings company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Athleta and MAS Holdings, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Athleta and MAS Holdings, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Athleta or MAS Holdings ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Athleta or MAS Holdings ?
Between Athleta and MAS Holdings, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Athleta and MAS Holdings, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES