Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ATFATF
VS
SAPSSAPS
ATF

ATF

99 NY Ave NE, Washington, 20226, US

Last Update: 27/08/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.atf.gov
475/1000Critical

ATF is a unique law enforcement agency in the United States Department of Justice that protects our communities from violent criminals, criminal organizations, the illegal use and trafficking of firearms, the illegal use and storage of explosives, acts of arson and bomb...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:2,151
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
SAPS

SAPS

ZA

Last Update: 08/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.saps.gov.za
842/1000Good

Policing in South Africa. I am attached to the newly formed Directorate for Priority Crime Investigations. Formally I was attached to the Detecitve Service and have been conduction investigations for over 25 years. I have also been attached to the National Inspectorate ...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:15,917
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ATF

ATF

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SAPS

SAPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

ATF has 35.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

SAPS has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - ATF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SAPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SAPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ATF

ATF

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ATF1787790603
SAPS

SAPS

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
SAP1788885365

FAQ

Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ATF company and SAPS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ATF and SAPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ATF and SAPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ATF or SAPS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ATF or SAPS ?
Between ATF and SAPS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ATF and SAPS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93291
SUMMARY

Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-93290
SUMMARY

Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-93289
SUMMARY

The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-88956
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
0.9
CVE-2026-88761
SUMMARY

The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-24
UPDATED
Date2026-09-24
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6