Comparison Overview

ATC Healthcare

VS

Manpower

ATC Healthcare

1983 Marcus Ave, None, New Hyde Park, New York, US, 11042
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

Since 1985, ATC Healthcare has been growing and providing “staffing wherever healthcare is provided” through our network of over 65 Franchised locations. Today we continue to support our nurses, healthcare professionals and facilities with innovative programs and benefits unique to the industry. If you are a healthcare professional seeking a challenging career opportunity, apply now online; or, if you are a healthcare facility looking for innovative programs to resolve your staffing challenges, find solutions with ATC! ATC is a team of innovative people dedicated to providing the highest quality staffing service to our clients and healthcare professionals. ATC has achieved The Gold Seal of Approval® from The Joint Commission.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 836
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Manpower

100 Manpower Place, None, Milwaukee, WI, US, 53212
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 700 and 749

Manpower is the global leader in contingent and permanent recruitment workforce solutions. We provide the agility businesses need with a continuum of staffing solutions. By leveraging our trusted brands, we have built a deeper talent pool to provide our clients access to the people they need, faster. We effectively assess and develop skills, keeping our associates ahead of the curve, so they can get the jobs done each time, every time.

NAICS: 5613
NAICS Definition: Employment Services
Employees: 28,793
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atchealthcare.jpeg
ATC Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ATC Healthcare
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Manpower
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ATC Healthcare in 2025.

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Manpower in 2025.

Incident History — ATC Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ATC Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Manpower (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Manpower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atchealthcare.jpeg
ATC Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Email Compromise
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Employee Email Accounts
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/manpower-.jpeg
Manpower
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Extortion
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Manpower company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ATC Healthcare company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ATC Healthcare company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Manpower company.

In the current year, Manpower company and ATC Healthcare company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Manpower company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ATC Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

ATC Healthcare company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Manpower company has not reported such incidents publicly.

ATC Healthcare company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Manpower company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither ATC Healthcare company nor Manpower company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ATC Healthcare company nor Manpower company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Manpower company employs more people globally than ATC Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Staffing and Recruiting.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ATC Healthcare nor Manpower holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X