Comparison Overview
American Tower Asia

American Tower Asia
Plot No. 14-A, Sector-18, GURUGRAM, HARYANA, 122015, IN
Last Update: 16/03/2026
Through a global portfolio of digital infrastructure assets and other communications real estate solutions, American Tower enables our partners and customers to keep people and communities connected in a responsible, equitable and sustainable way. With the increasing p...

BT Group
One Braham, London, GB, E1 8EE
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We’re one of the world’s leading communications services companies. At BT Group, the solutions we sell are integral to modern life. Our purpose is as simple as it is ambitious: we connect for good. There are no limits to what people can do when they connect. And as te...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

American Tower Asia







BT Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for American Tower Asia in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for BT Group in 2026.
Incident History - American Tower Asia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
American Tower Asia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - BT Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
BT Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

American Tower Asia

BT Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.