Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Atasun OptikAtasun Optik
VS
Harris TeeterHarris Teeter
Atasun Optik

Atasun Optik

Esentepe Mahallesi Keskin Kalem Sokak No:5, İstanbul, İstanbul 34394, TR

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Dünyada 44’ten fazla ülkede, 6.100’den fazla mağazası ve 31.000’den fazla çalışanıyla faaliyet gösteren, bulunduğu pazarların optik perakendesinde lideri konumunda olan Hollandalı GrandVision şirketinin %100 iştiraki Atasun Optik olarak 2007 yılından beri Türkiye’de faa...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Harris Teeter

Harris Teeter

701 Crestdale Drive, Matthews, 28105, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.harristeeter.com
788/1000Fair

Founded in 1960 in North Carolina, Harris Teeter has been enriching the lives of our customers and our communities for decades. Today, Harris Teeter employs 36,000 valued associates and operates more than 250 stores and 70 fuel centers in seven states and the District o...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:14,778
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Atasun Optik

Atasun Optik

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Harris Teeter

Harris Teeter

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atasun Optik in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harris Teeter in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Atasun Optik (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atasun Optik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Harris Teeter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harris Teeter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Atasun Optik

Atasun Optik

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Harris Teeter

Harris Teeter

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Atasun Optik company and Harris Teeter company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Atasun Optik and Harris Teeter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Atasun Optik and Harris Teeter, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Atasun Optik or Harris Teeter ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Atasun Optik or Harris Teeter ?
Between Atasun Optik and Harris Teeter, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Atasun Optik and Harris Teeter, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9