Comparison Overview
At-Bay

At-Bay
San Francisco, 94105, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
At-Bay is the world’s first InsurSec provider designed from the ground up to help businesses tackle cyber risk head on. By combining industry-leading insurance with world-class cybersecurity technology, At-Bay offers end-to-end prevention and protection for the digital ...

Liberty Mutual Insurance
175 Berkeley Street, Boston, 02116, US
Last Update: 21/05/2026
At Liberty Mutual, we believe progress happens when people feel secure. For more than 110 years we have helped people and businesses embrace today and confidently pursue tomorrow by providing protection for the unexpected and delivering it with care. A Fortune 100 c...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

At-Bay







Liberty Mutual Insurance






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for At-Bay in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Liberty Mutual Insurance has 4.76% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - At-Bay (X = Date, Y = Severity)
At-Bay cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Liberty Mutual Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Liberty Mutual Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

At-Bay

Liberty Mutual Insurance
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in certain releases of Ciena Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS), Manage Control Plan (MCP), and Blue Planet products. The issue is caused by improper handling of HTTP request paths and headers, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to manipulate requests in a manner that bypasses authentication and associated audit logging controls.
In Ciena's Navigator Network Control Suite (NCS) and Manage Control Plan (MCP), there are hidden system accounts used for internal software operations. Some of these accounts have default passwords that may be predictable. While these accounts have very limited permissions on their own, an attacker could combine an attack using one of these accounts with other potential weaknesses to launch a more significant attack, possibly leading to escalation of privilege on the system.
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the openhtj2k_decoder_impl::invoke, invoke_line_based, invoke_line_based_stream, and invoke_line_based_predecoded function in source/core/interface/decoder.cpp
Buffer Overflow vulnerability in OpenHTJ2K v.0.18.4 and before allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code via the j2k_precinct_subband::parse_packet_header() in source/core/coding/coding_units.cpp
Incorrect access control in the /api/License/deactivateOffline endpoint of CAXPerts UniversalPlantViewer WebServices Server v2.7.6 allows authenticated attackers with low-level privileges to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via removing the license from the webserver.